What, no emoticons?
C'mon, you guys are icon designers! (lol)
Seriously, I'd get a kick out of seeing you guys implement some in-house emoticons here in the Blog Forum. :)
Get updates with RSS
Be the first to know about new products and free stuff from IconBuffet. Subscribe to our RSS feed:
Find work or post a listing at Authentic Jobs.
electricnet on Mar 22, 2007
They should use the Manhattan Smilies on here. :P
watehey on Mar 22, 2007
Or at least enable us to post images using HTML code.
iconmaster on Mar 22, 2007
I like this idea.
tamashii on Mar 22, 2007
This path of thinking is worthy.
travisseitler on Mar 22, 2007
Well, I was thinking about Manhattan Smilies myself (I use both sets on my blog) but it'd be nice to see something new, too. ::hint hint::
Sly on Mar 22, 2007
Why don't the Chefs just bite the bullet and create a sensible post parser like message boards use. Then smilies and HTML can be easily controlled and < i > < /i > tags become [i] [/i]. It's then very easy to pair up tags so that adding a random tag does not "screw up" the rest of the thread like adding a single tag does now!
Sly on Mar 22, 2007
Why don't the Chefs just bite the bullet and create a sensible post parser like message boards use. Then smilies and HTML can be easily controlled and < i > < /i > tags become [i] [/i]. It's then very easy to pair up tags so that adding a random tag does not "screw up" the rest of the thread like adding a single tag does now!
Sly on Mar 22, 2007
Why don't the Chefs just bite the bullet and create a sensible post parser like message boards use. Then smilies and HTML can be easily controlled and < i > < /i > tags become [i] [/i]. It's then very easy to pair up tags so that adding a random tag does not "screw up" the rest of the thread like adding a single tag does now!
Sly on Mar 22, 2007
Why don't the Chefs just bite the bullet and create a sensible post parser like message boards use. Then smilies and HTML can be easily controlled and < i > < /i > tags become [i] [/i]. It's then very easy to pair up tags so that adding a random tag does not "screw up" the rest of the thread like adding a single tag does now!
Sly on Mar 22, 2007
Oh brother, sorry about the multiple posts, there seems to be some posting issues today :(
Sly on Mar 22, 2007
Oh brother, sorry about the multiple posts, there seems to be some posting issues today :(
justG on Mar 22, 2007
I'm probably in the minority, but I like the limited posting ability. I don't think anything more sophisticated than code to add links and italics and bold for emphasis is needed. I'm actually quite happy not to see those phpBB emoticons bouncing all over the place, and I'm quite happy to see text that is uniform in size and colour across posts. It keeps the focus on the site's beautiful design, instead of making this space look like a MySpace comments area. ASCII emoticons are fine by me. =)
travisseitler on Mar 22, 2007
Hmph. You're no fun.
;)
travisseitler on Mar 22, 2007
;)