Why not 128x128 icons?
I love 32x32, I have a huge collection from the Mac OS 7, 8.5 and 9 days but... it seems iconbuffet is all about 32x32, why not have a mix between 32x32 releases and 128x128?
LCD resolutions keep getting higher and we might be seeing 300 DPI screens soon, I think we need some 128x128 love around here :D
Get updates with RSS
Be the first to know about new products and free stuff from IconBuffet. Subscribe to our RSS feed:
Find work or post a listing at Authentic Jobs.
sloan on Jan 26, 2008
yup at least 64 as I had asked (posted) for before, for docks web apps etc
emanaton on Jan 26, 2008
Bah! Just stretch 'em out taller/wider. If your content is good, no one will even notice something's askew with your icons!
Emanaton dot com
» IB Pagan --» (ref. Calling All Seekers!)
» IB Monks
» The Pirates
iconmaster on Jan 26, 2008
128s just take too long. If we did that, you'd be getting two icons per set instead of 8 or 10.
migueld on Jan 26, 2008
Come on iconmaster, you are a vector master, and vectors scale! ;) :P I'd love something along the lines of Smoothicons series from Iconfactory, which are pure vector and look great on all sizes.
louiemctool on Jan 26, 2008
iconfactory? you come here and mention iconfactory?!
BANNED!!!!
:)